Skip to main content

Halo does not look good but its worth to F1 was made clear at Belgian GP | Giles Richards

Charles Leclerc was saved by the new addition at the Belgian GP while Ferrari made their power advantage pay

The halo cockpit protection device found few fans when it was imposed by the FIA at the start of this season. Certainly on aesthetic grounds no one liked it but its role was to improve safety around the drivers’ head, an area identified by the FIA as one of the last remaining vulnerable areas of the car. It had the data to back up the decision to implement it, which changed the mind of some naysayers, including Lewis Hamilton. At Spa its worth was made clear to all. Whether the device specifically prevented Charles Leclerc from serious injury or worse in the crash with Fernando Alonso is irrelevant. Looking at the incident, it would have been a miracle, as the race director, Charlie Whiting, put it, were Leclerc not at least hit in the head but for the halo. Which is justification enough. There may be better looking alternatives to come in future but for now the halo as earned its place on every car.

Continue reading...

from The Guardian https://ift.tt/2NnuklK

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...