A naked triumph: why the male nude is – thankfully

A naked triumph: why the male nude is – thankfully – back in the limelight

For decades, the male nude was sidelined by patriarchal possessors of the female form - from Picasso to Magritte. Now, the RA’s spring exhibition will celebrate it once again

I can’t help smiling at the Royal Academy’s avowedly radical announcement that its exhibition The Renaissance Nude next spring will aim for “parity” of naked men and women in response to #MeToo. It is nice PR, but all the curators are doing is reflecting the history of the nude in art. From the classical era to the Renaissance and beyond, the male body was disrobed as enthusiastically as the female – if not more so. It is a fact that has never escaped souvenir sellers in Florence, who plaster the cock and balls of Michelangelo’s David on everything from calendars to kitchen aprons.

This makes The Renaissance Nude a timely exhibition, but not because it will “correct” the Renaissance view of the human body to today’s standards. On the contrary, the Renaissance can correct us. Imagine if the RA had made a similar announcement about an exhibition called The Modern Nude. For the period from 1900 to the 1960s, it would have had to falsify the extremely unequal facts. Picasso and Matisse were among the most patriarchal possessors of the female form in the history of art and Klimt, Schiele, Dalí and Magritte all shared that focus. Only in more recent times have the male nudes of Bacon, Hockney, Mapplethorpe and Freud moved us towards parity.

Continue reading...

from The Guardian https://ift.tt/2oGEWBp

Comments

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...

KnightViral

Search This Blog