Skip to main content

The Guardian view on Saudi Arabia: will it pay for Jamal Khashoggi’s fate? | Editorial

The suspected murder of the journalist has led to unprecedented pressure on Riyadh. The west should not be tempted to return to business as usual

Saudi Arabia faces unprecedented pressure over the fate of Jamal Khashoggi, the journalist who disappeared after entering its consulate in Istanbul last week and is believed to have been murdered there. A bipartisan group of senators has forced a US investigation to determine whether sanctions should be imposed under the Magnitsky Act. Bob Corker, the Republican chair of the Senate foreign relations committee, said he believed the Saudis killed Mr Khashoggi; his colleague Lindsey Graham said there would be “hell to pay” if so. Even Donald Trump told reporters: “We can’t let this happen.” The British foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, has warned that “friendships depend on shared values”.

But when someone shows you who they are, you should believe them the first time. Saudi Arabia’s de facto leader, Mohammed bin Salman, has done so many times. Western countries did not want to take heed. Their transactional relationships with Riyadh predated the rise of the 33-year-old, and were impervious to its appalling human rights record – arms sales, domestic security concerns and the belief that it was a force for stability in the region took priority. The crown prince’s grand economic promises and social reforms, such as allowing women to drive, won him praise internationally but were accompanied by a sharp crackdown on dissent. Saudi power is now more concentrated, more brutal, more impatient, more impetuous – and more confident that it can act as it sees fit thanks to the embrace of Mr Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

Continue reading...

from The Guardian https://ift.tt/2PrBypJ

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...