Skip to main content

If judges think women who date online ‘would have sex with anyone’, we’re really in trouble | Chitra Ramaswamy

According to the barrister Helena Kennedy, some judges have woefully outdated views. No wonder courts let women down

What do you think of women who date online? Do you a) wish them luck and then lose interest, because it’s none of your damn business b) worry, because it’s tough out there with the threat of sexual violence, blocking of ethnic groups (known in non-tech speak as racism), misogyny and people who think the way to your heart is with a tiger selfie or c) think it means they will sleep with anyone. If you answered c, you are at best woefully out of touch, at worst an old-school sexist. And, quite possibly, a British judge.

According to Helena Kennedy QC, speaking at London’s annual Bar conference, there are judges who think women who date online “would have sex with anyone”. Let’s take a moment to digest this double whammy. First, the view that women who date online – it is estimated that one in five people now meet their partners via the internet – are a bit desperate and would thus have sex with anyone. Second, the victim-blaming that goes hand in hand with this particular brand of retrograde sexism. The next step? Dating online makes you responsible for what happens to you.

Continue reading...

from The Guardian https://ift.tt/2ReTchz

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...