Skip to main content

Macron denounces nationalism as avowed “nationalist” Trump stands steps away

The two leaders’ “bromance” isn’t what it used to be.

At the World War I Armistice Day commemoration on Sunday, French President Emmanuel Macron took a pointed stand against nationalism — calling it a “betrayal of patriotism” — while standing steps away from Donald Trump.

Macron warned that “the old demons” which led to that war a century ago have been resurfacing and said that “giving into the fascination for withdrawal, isolationism, violence and domination would be a grave error.”

“Patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism,” the French president said, according to a translation of his remarks. “Nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism. By saying our interests first, who cares about the others, we erase what a nation holds dearest, what gives it life, what makes it great and what is essential: its moral values.”

This was also the line of the speech Macron’s office chose to tweet out:

Trump recently labelled himself a nationalist, adopting the loaded term as a badge of honor.

“A globalist is a person that wants the globe to do well, frankly not caring about our country so much, and you know what, we can’t have that,” he said at a campaign rally in October. “I’m a nationalist. Ok? I’m a nationalist. Nationalist. Use that word.”

According to the Washington Post, Macron went on to say that the millions of soldiers who fought and died did so to reject the “selfishness of nations only looking after their own interests,” in an apparent dig at Trump’s campaign-trail remarks and “America First” policies.

Macron’s remarks could also have been aimed at Russian President Vladimir Putin, who showed up last to the ceremony, or any of the other nations across Europe showing rising nationalism — including Macron’s own. But though the French president didn’t mention Trump or America by name, his US counterpart seemed to sense the rebuke was meant for him. As NBC reports, “After Macron finished his remarks, Trump appeared to grimace while offering muted and delayed applause.”

Macron and Trump’s “bromance” isn’t what it used to be

Today’s speech is just the latest unravelling of the Trump-Macron bromance. Once chummy and physically affectionate (in a manly-man kind of way), the two world leaders have begun airing their ideological differences and policy disagreements more openly.

Trump and Macron have had their differences from the start: In June 2017, just a month after he was inaugurated, Macron released a three-minute statement in response to Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement, saying “make our planet great again.” But Macron positioned himself as one of the few world leaders who could get Trump’s ear, and they built an unexpectedly strong personal relationship. Trump once famously brushed dandruff from Macron’s shoulder, calling him “perfect.

Today is not, however, the first time Macron has specifically rebuked Trump’s “America First” mentality. In an April 2018 address to a joint session of Congress, Macron slammed Trump, also without mentioning him by name. As Vox’s Zeeshan Aleem noted, the French president’s “thinly veiled criticism of his host stood in stark contrast to the chummy rapport” the two displayed on his visit:

Macron, widely considered to be Trump’s favorite European leader, laid out positions sharply at odds with Trump’s positions on the Iran nuclear deal (Macron said the US should stay in it), climate change (Macron said it was real and needed to be fought), free trade (Macron warned against protectionism), and international cooperation more broadly.

“We can choose isolationism, withdrawal, and nationalism. This is an option. It can be tempting to us as a temporary remedy to our fears,” Macron said. “But closing the door to the world will not stop the evolution of the world.”

Sunday’s remarks suggest tensions are still high between the two leaders, despite efforts to smooth things over in a Saturday meeting.

Trump may have gotten a thumbs-down from Macron, but another world leader had a thumbs-up for him: Vladimir Putin, who strolled in late, before offering the president a handshake and a thumbs-up.



from Vox - All https://ift.tt/2RIWcT0

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...