Skip to main content

'Roma' Should Win Best Picture, but It Probably Won't

The Academy announced its nominees for the 2019 Oscars this morning, and Roma cleaned up, along with The Favourite, earning ten nominations apiece. The recognition for these two smart, fresh cinematic gems feels validating, especially during an awards season when Green Book and Bohemian Rhapsody—two nostalgic, revisionist films that seem hell-bent on sanitizing the messier bits of the late-20th century—have dominated industry accolades so far.

Alfonso Cuarón’s tale about a family’s beloved domestic worker in early 1970s Mexico City is gorgeous, from the way its slice-of-life narrative gently unfolds to its stunning black and white cinematography. The story of Cleo, played with beautiful solemness by first-time actor Yalitza Aparicio, is specific to the time, place, and historical context in which Roma is set, though it mirrors the experiences of domestic workers to this day. It’s also relatable to anyone who’s been forced to reckon with the hierarchies of an unjust world or suffer loss while the world spins on in defiance of your pain.

After seeing Roma, my first impulse was to tweet that it deserved to win Best Picture at the Academy Awards. By my estimation, it ticks all the boxes: an affecting story, check. Deft writing, spanning several languages, check. Standout performances from the entire cast, with particular emphasis on Aparicio’s graceful stillness, check. Beautiful cinematography evoking the dreamy nature of childhood memories, check.

In a lot of ways, Roma has already broken ground for diversity in film. It’s tied with Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon for the most Oscar nominations for a foreign film. Aparicio is the first Indigenous woman to be nominated for Best Actress. Roma is also only the tenth foreign language film to be nominated for Best Picture. If it won, it’d be the first foreign language film to do so in the 91 years the Academy has been handing out awards.

More likely, the Oscars will reward Roma in other ways. Cuarón has dominated the Best Director category so far this season, picking up statues at the Golden Globes and Critics Choice Awards. It won’t be surprising if he takes home his second Academy Award in that category for Roma. It also wouldn’t be surprising for the film to win Best Foreign Film at this year’s Oscars, but considering that this is the first time a foreign language film has had a serious shot at winning the top award, relegating it to the Foreign Film category feels like a consolation prize.

It’s hard not to feel like the only thing holding Roma back is the fact that it’s not in English. In a decade when Hollywood is embroiled in scandal, criticized for turning a blind eye towards sexual harassment and lambasted for being “so white,” crowning Roma the year’s Best Picture would be a radical act. The Academy should reward this example of masterful filmmaking by a Mexican director, who chose to tell the story of a woman disenfranchised by the dual aspects of colonialism and capitalism.

Frankly, we need more movies like Roma to win, and we need more people and studios to support movies like it. What the Academy thinks appeals to audiences isn’t necessarily representative of what truly moves them. Roma is an exceptional example of meaningful moviemaking for how it invites viewers into its distinct world, then spits them out again, hopefully imbuing them with a new appreciation for the ways people differ and the way we’re all, actually, pretty similar.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Kara Weisenstein on Twitter.



from VICE http://bit.ly/2sF4PUb

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...