Skip to main content

The Most Popular ‘Bandersnatch’ Choices Show We're Not All Complete Monsters

Netflix made waves in late December with its interactive, choose-your-own-adventure movie Black Mirror: Bandersnatch. Set in 1984, it follows Stefan, a young programmer, who begins to question reality while adapting a fantasy novel into a video game. As Stefan navigates the "most important day of his life," viewers are prompted to make choices for him, many of them seemingly mundane, like which cereal he should eat for breakfast.

As viewers quickly found out, Bandersnatch splinters into so many diverging plot lines that even the creator of Black Mirror doesn't remember exactly how to access a secret post-credits scene containing a pretty bonkers Easter egg. Its seemingly infinite number of possible endings prompted many viewers to watch, and then rewatch, and then rewatch again in the futile hope that they might figure the whole thing out.

Now, Netflix is peppering its social media feeds with data on some of the most and least popular choices people made for Stefan, the film's protagonist. Regarding the cereal question—Frosties or Sugar Puffs—over 60 percent of viewers chose to feed him Frosties, according to the streaming service.

Netflix also revealed that British audiences were less likely to "throw tea" on a computer than other folks across the globe. People in the UK chose that option only 52.9 percent of the time, while the rest of the world did 55.9 percent of the time.

Viewers also apparently wanted to help Stefan secure the bag, because 73 percent of people told him to accept the job offer he got from the gaming company Tuckersoft.

Finally, it's nice to hear, at least, that out of the five main endings to Bandersnatch, the most morbid one—where Stefan gets on the train with his mom—was the least popular.

We hope Netflix will keep dropping bits of info as more data rolls in. The company sure seems to be having fun with it.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Taylor Hosking on Twitter.



from VICE http://bit.ly/2DjVs2w

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...