Skip to main content

Shock value has its role for animal rights campaigners | Paul Chadwick

Warnings that content may distress some viewers can reduce the impact sought by activists

Judging by its wiry, dun-coloured fur, its ears and snout, the dog was perhaps an airedale, lying side-on and close up to the camera. But identification was difficult because most of its body had been skinned and it seemed in the process of being barbecued whole. The arresting image was the title-screen still from a video about the protest methods of animal rights activists.

Readers reacted quickly. “Please get this off our screens without delay. It is horrible that the Guardian would stoop so low and call it journalism.” One person complained that “the title and content of the article gives no clue that a close-up image of the face and body of a butchered animal will appear, and it is not directly related to the content, either”. In the context of serious video journalism exploring a strand of contemporary political activism, there was clear editorial justification for reporting, signposted, the mock barbecue staged by protesters in a shopping precinct in Sydney. (Their sign on the barbecue read: “If you wouldn’t eat a dog, why eat a lamb? Go vegan!”)

Continue reading...

from The Guardian https://ift.tt/2TeYfTl

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...