Skip to main content

Whose line is it anyway? The battle of actor v playwright

Playwright Anya Reiss has provoked a flood of indignation over her remarks on Twitter in which she exhorted actors to stick to their jobs and just say their lines

As an actor, I can’t stop thinking about a line by the playwright Anya Reiss. Not a line from one of her plays, but a recent tweet in which she exhorts actors to just do their jobs and say their lines. This sounds like a sentiment that will be engraved on the concrete of the National Theatre once Jeremy Clarkson becomes the government’s tsar of arts.

It’s a bad idea to get on the wrong side of actors, who have a lot of down time and are generally trying to make the most of free cafe wifi. Not that she is the first. George Bernard Shaw’s stage directions were passive-aggressive litanies of precision – he did not trust actors’ brains. Alfred Hitchock manipulated stars like chess pieces and once professed to be envious of Walt Disney, saying: “If he doesn’t like an actor, he just tears him up.” In fairness to Reiss, many performers are prone to bouts of the Brando. Paraphrasing, mannered cadences, mumbling: I have done it all. On the other hand, I have been in rooms where an actor’s slip or amendment unlocked a meaning that the writer fell in love with, and back-wrote into the script. (Not any of the times I did it, but you know, I was there.)

Continue reading...

from The Guardian http://bit.ly/2TzCISe

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...