Skip to main content

One True Brexit's standard bearers stand firm in bonkers battle | John Crace

Bruges Group regard change of leaving day from 29 March as moment of national surrender

The previous day’s exertions had rather taken it out of everyone. Having voted to allow itself indicative votes on the next stage of the Brexit process, parliament pretty much awarded itself a day off while Sir Oliver Letwin and a handful of helpers were having an ontological debate on the meaning of meaning as they tried to work out what colour the ballot papers would be and what font should be used. Most MPs were having a quiet lie down, struggling to work out if there was any point to anything any more as the government that couldn’t govern had already indicated it would regard all indicative votes as non-indicative. A theatre of the absurd.

But at a thinly attended meeting of the Eurosceptic Bruges Group in Westminster, the standard bearers of the One True Brexit fought on. Here were the true believers. The resistance. The paramilitary wing of the Rotary club, threatening mass civil disobedience if Jacob Rees-Mogg failed to maintain his opposition to Theresa May’s withdrawal agreement. Lawns would not be mown, cars would not be washed and churchwardens would go on strike. Society as we knew it in suburban and rural England would grind to a halt. This was the worst day in the country’s history in the past 200 years, said one man. And that included women getting the vote.

Continue reading...

from The Guardian https://ift.tt/2TBbFFj

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...