Skip to main content

Trump first suggested North Korea wasn’t responsible for Otto Warmbier’s death. Now he’s walking it back.

Trump has a habit of trusting the word of tyrants.

President Donald Trump can be shamed into (kind of) walking back comments that reflect kindly on known tyrants — all it takes is resounding criticism that overshadows any of his related accomplishments.

After receiving widespread negative coverage of comments he made earlier this week appearing to absolve North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un in the death of Otto Warmbier, a US student who died after being imprisoned in North Korea for over a year, Trump said Friday he was “misinterpreted.”

At a summit between the US and North Korea earlier this week, Trump was asked by reporters if he had confronted Kim about Warmbier’s death. The president confirmed that he did ask about the young American’s mysterious death in 2017, and said he believed Kim “felt badly,” but claimed to have known nothing about it at the time.

It’s highly unlikely that the North Korean dictator wasn’t aware of the high-profile case of an American captive that made headlines around the globe. Still, Trump on Thursday said it wasn’t in Kim’s “advantage to allow that to happen.”

“He tells me that he didn’t know about it and I will take him at his word,” Trump told reporters after the summit held in Vietnam.

A day later, however, Trump backtracked his statement, tweeting that he holds North Korea responsible for Warmbier’s brutal treatment.

Warmbier, a University of Virginia student, was traveling through North Korea in late 2015 when he was detained and accused of stealing a propaganda poster. He was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor. The Trump administration was able to secure his return home in 2017, but he arrived in a severe coma. As Vox reported at the time, “although many have speculated that Warmbier was tortured, leaving him unable to speak, see, or respond to verbal commands, there is no medical evidence proving physical abuse.”

Warmbier’s parents have described in gruesome detail the horrific state their son was in when he’d returned to the US. “It looked like someone had taken a pair of pliers and re-arranged his bottom teeth,” Warmbier’s father Fred told GQ magazine. Warmbier died a short time later at the age of 22.

Trump’s comments were met with rounds of bipartisan criticism for failing to outright condemn Kim’s regime. Sen. Chuck Schumer demanded that he apologize to Warmbier’s parents. Trump’s former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley sub-tweeted him. Sen. Rob Porter took to the Senate floor calling on the president to not be “naive” about the “brutal nature” of the North Korean regime.

Warmbier’s parents, who once praised Trump for securing their son’s release, issued a statement this week railing on the president’s performance at the summit. “Kim and his evil regime are responsible for unimaginable cruelty and inhumanity,” the statement read.

No excuses or lavish praise can change that.”

Trump has a troubling habit of trusting the word of dictators

It’s worth remembering that Kim is a totalitarian dictator responsible for profound human rights violations. He’s accused of ordering the assassination of his own half-brother, deliberately starving his own citizens and arbitrarily executing top officials with anti-aircraft guns.

That hasn’t stopped Trump from repeatedly referring to Kim as “my friend,” or hailing their “great relationship.” The two leaders are apparently pen pals — Trump boasted of receiving “beautiful letters” from the North Korean dictator.

And Trump’s initial instinct to hold back criticism or condemnation is a move we’ve seen from the president before. Kim isn’t the only dictator for Trump to extend the benefit of doubt.

As Vox’s Aaron Rupar notes, Trump has also been willing to believe Russian President Vladimir Putin, who reputation for overseeing campaigns to kill journalists and political opponents, over his own intel chiefs:

Though the US intelligence community concluded that Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election on Trump’s behalf, Trump said during a joint news conference with Putin last July that Putin “was extremely strong and powerful in his denial” and hence “I don’t see any reason” to believe the US intelligence community over Putin’s word. Trump’s comments were widely criticized, and he later said he misspoke.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, known as MBS, is another unsavory friend of the president. Though Saudi Arabia is a longtime ally to the US, the country is beset by a range of human rights abuses. US intelligence agencies believe MBS was even involved in the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, a journalist who wrote critically of the Saudi government and was likely strangled to death and dismembered last fall.

Trump’s response to the murder: The crown prince says he wasn’t involved, and so Trump is taking his word on it.

See a pattern here?



from Vox - All https://ift.tt/2VwqQkw

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...