Skip to main content

Trump’s new executive order on campus free speech is more symbolism than substance

President Donald Trump speaking during CPAC 2019 on March 2. He said he would draft an executive uphold free speech during his CPAC speech.

Trump is tying free speech to federal research grant money. That’s already part of current law.

President Donald Trump will sign an executive order Thursday on a cause célèbre for conservative activists: upholding free speech on college campuses.

But the executive order won’t do much more than reiterate the Trump administration wants schools to follow existing laws on free inquiry and direct the federal agencies that fund research to make sure that they’re doing so. It’s a largely a symbolic move meant to satisfy a key demand of Trump’s conservative base.

Trump first promised he would draft an executive order to protect free speech earlier this month during a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference. The president vowed to put in new free speech protections as he stood next to conservative activist Hayden Williams, who was allegedly attacked on the University of California Berkeley campus in February as he was recruiting members.

Conservative celebrities and activists have complained about schools canceling their speaking engagements, saying it violates constitutionally-protected free speech. Trump clearly sympathizes with them. When a Milo Yiannopoulos event at Berkeley was abruptly canceled in 2017 after anti-Yiannopoulos protests turned violent, the president threatened to pull the school’s federal funding in a tweet.

“If they want our dollars, and we give it to them by the billions, they’ve got to allow people like Hayden and many other great young people and old people to speak,” Trump said during his March CPAC speech. “Free speech. If they don’t, it will be costly. That will be signed soon.”

But the Trump administration won’t define exactly would have to happen on a college campus to put federal research grant money at risk. A senior White House official was asked to give examples numerous times during a Thursday press call, and repeatedly declined.

“I won’t get into implementation details but OMB [the Office of Management and Budget] will work with each agency on implementation,” the official said. “That will be coming in the next several weeks and months.”

Colleges already have to protect free speech to get federal money

Public universities already must operate to uphold the rights protected in the Constitution’s First Amendment. Private universities have leeway to set up their own rules around free speech, but must “comply with their stated institutional policies regarding free inquiry,” the Trump administration official said.

The language in Trump’s new executive order directs 12 federal agencies currently funding university research (including the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and others) to ensure that colleges are obeying existing federal laws and regulations on free speech.

“While many schools — or all schools — are frankly supposed to follow this currently, it will ensure that grant dollars are associated through the grant-making process, and schools will have to certify that they’re following this condition,” the senior administration official told reporters on Thursday.

Those agencies, rather than the Department of Education, will have to enforce those requirements. The Trump administration official was also unable to say how much federal research money the new order would affect. “I can’t give you an exact figure,” the official said.

The reaction from at least one outside group focusing on campus free speech issues was that though Trump’s executive order should be uncontroversial on its face, it is still unclear how the administration will enforce it.

“To the extent that today’s executive order asks colleges and universities to meet their existing legal obligations, it should be uncontroversial,” the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, a group that focuses on college free speech issues, said in a statement. “We note that the order does not specify how or by what standard federal agencies will ensure compliance, the order’s most consequential component.”

The federal government spent about $32 billion on scientific research at universities in the 2017 fiscal year, according to the National Science Foundation.

The order — which Trump is set to sign later Thursday — might still be vague in terms of policy. But it sends a message that Trump is eager to embrace the priorities of conservative activists, including those upset about being banned from college campuses.



from Vox - All https://ift.tt/2OmKjBW

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...