Skip to main content

Steak 'n Shake CEO Says Ditching Cherries in Milkshakes Would Save $1 Million a Year

The first Steak ‘n Shake opened 85 years ago in the town of Normal, Illinois, in a space that had previously been a combination gas station-and-chicken restaurant. In an attempt to show his new customers how fresh his steakburgers were, founder Gus Belt apparently had a habit of bringing a “barrel of steaks” into the dining area, and grinding the meat in front of the delighted (?!?) guests. As a result, one of the chain’s slogans was “In Sight It Must Be Right.”

That tradition was abandoned somewhere in the last century but, according to the chain’s current CEO, another part of the restaurant’s history could be on the way out too: the cherries on Steak ‘n Shake’s signature milkshakes. According to a scathing post on investment website Seeking Alpha, top exec Sardar Biglari told shareholders that the flailing chain could save up to a million dollars every year, if it just stopped with that whole cherry-on-top thing.

It’s fair to say that Steak ‘n Shake is struggling. The chain reported an $18.9 million loss in the first quarter of this year, on top of the $10.7 million loss that it accumulated during 2018. The Indianapolis Business Journal reports that customer traffic has dropped 13 percent over the last three years, and it was down 7.7 percent in the first quarter of this year. (Guys, they don’t grind the meat at the tables anymore! It’s OK!) It has temporarily closed 60 of its company-owned locations as it attempts to transition them into franchisee-owned restaurants and, on top of that, in May, a federal judge in Missouri ordered the chain to pay $7.7 million in damages after it allegedly failed to pay overtime to 286 St. Louis-area restaurant managers.

Steak ‘n Shake is currently owned by the 41-year-old Biglari’s own Biglari Holdings, which also owns the Western Sizzlin’ steakhouse chain, First Guard insurance, and Maxim magazine, which is somehow still a thing. Although Biglari has a lot to deal with at the moment, he seems to be really focused on those milkshakes. At the recent Biglari Holdings shareholders’ meeting, Biglari said that part of the plan to turn the company around included making homemade ice cream on-site, implementing his own new milkshake-making process, and installing new milkshake-making machines, which could cost upwards of $40 million.

“He is literally inventing a new milkshake-making process—he said at the meeting that this was going to be a patented process—and that is going to speed up service,” one shareholder told the Indianapolis Business Journal. “The shareholders seemed to think this was ridiculous—and I would tend to agree—to think that Sardar, with all his free time, is going to be able to invent a milkshake process to turn the whole chain around.”

At the meeting, one shareholder reportedly reminded Biglari that this time last year, his plan to save the chain was “thicker cheese and better bacon,” but customer numbers still fell. And the year before that, it was the launch of a new menu—but that didn’t help either. “Why was this year’s turnaround plan—new milkshake processes and homemade ice cream—going to work when the last few did not?,” the Seeking Alpha writer, who attended the meeting, wondered. “[Biglari] said, because they have to get Steak ‘n Shake turned around. He said he has been through uncertainty with businesses in the past and it has always worked out. He is comfortable with uncertainty. He said something like he doesn’t worry.”

Well, he does worry—but about the cost of cherries, telling shareholders that he would “love to get rid of” the $1 million in annual cherry expenditures. That statement was reportedly challenged by three different shareholders, who each pointed out that there might be better ways to save money that didn’t involve skimping on milkshake toppings.

It sounds like there are a lot of issues at Steak ‘n Shake right now. Maybe they should go back to that whole ‘watch us grind this big pile of meat’ thing. It can’t possibly make things worse.



from VICE http://bit.ly/2JlRR89

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...