Skip to main content

The US Ban on Huawei Is Causing a Global Mess

The US ban on Chinese electronics manufacturer Huawei is having ripple effects that are making an even bigger mess of the entangled rat king that is the global tech industry.

The US Commerce Department put Huawei on the “Entity List,” which is essentially a trade blacklist, last week due to national security concerns. Though the supply ban originates in the US, companies including chipmakers and telecoms based in Europe and Japan are falling in line, and the ripple effects are being felt all over the world. Here’s a summary of some of the fallout from the ban so far:

For some non-US companies, the decision to fall in line with the US ban on Huawei reflects the highly-connected nature of the global tech industry, where multinational corporations may have staff or interests in several countries.

“ARM has a lot of staff in the US, and probably US legal entities. I suspect that it would be a fair amount of work for them to untangle themselves to get to a point where they could act as a UK company,” said Kyle Wiens, CEO of device repair advocacy site iFixit. “If I were their management, I’d figure that it’s probably easiest right now to fall in line and let the US/China governments negotiate a ceasefire.”

iFixit does teardowns of electronics, which often reveal the interconnected, global nature of device manufacturing. Those teardowns reveal that Apple doesn’t really make most of the components that are in the iPhone. Huawei doesn’t make many of the components in its phones, either: The Huawei P20 Pro has a camera made by Germany’s Leica; chips made by Dutch company NXP; American companies Micron, Cypress, Texas Instruments, and SkyWorks; and parts made by South Korea’s Samsung.

The fallout from the US Huawei ban makes clear how interconnected US tech companies and the Chinese firm are, and it also traces the tangled web of a global industry that is now navigating a national trade ban.

Listen to CYBER , Motherboard’s new weekly podcast about hacking and cybersecurity.



from VICE http://bit.ly/2M2B9Nc

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...