Skip to main content

China Says U.S. Allies Face Retaliation If They Host Missiles

China Says U.S. Allies Face Retaliation If They Host Missiles(Bloomberg) -- China warned that the U.S. and its Asia-Pacific allies risked countermeasures if they accepted the deployment of intermediate-range American missiles, singling out Australia, Japan and South Korea.China’s foreign ministry said in a statement late Monday that the country “will not sit idly by” in response to such threats, urging the U.S. to avoid escalating tensions. A ministry official separately said Tuesday that the trio of allies should “exercise prudence” and that the deployment of such weapons would “not serve the national security interests of these countries.”The comments underscore the difficulty facing the Trump administration’s effort to counter China’s own missile capabilities in the region after formally withdrawing last week from its Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty with Russia. Any country that accepts the missiles risks diplomatic and economic retaliation from Beijing -- and all three U.S. allies mentioned count China as their largest trading partner.Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison ruled out hosting U.S. missile bases Monday, after U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper said he was in favor or deploying American missiles in Asia within months. South Korea already suffered a trade blow from China after agreeing in 2016 to accept Lockheed Martin Corp.’s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or Thaad, anti-missile system to defend against North Korea.Australia Won’t Consider Hosting U.S. Missiles, PM Morrison Says“China will not just sit idly by and watch our interests being compromised,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said in a statement. “What’s more, we will not allow any country to stir up troubles at our doorstep. We will take all necessary measures to safeguard national security interests.”Limited OptionsFu Cong, director of the ministry’s arms control department, also said the U.S. move would have a “direct negative impact on the global strategic stability,” according to the foreign ministry’s transcript of a briefing with the official. He mentioned Australia, Japan and South Korea by name.The 1987 INF treaty required the U.S. and Russia to never deploy ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (about 300 to 3,500 miles) -- either nuclear or conventional. The Trump administration formally withdrew after complaining about violations by Russia and a desire to include China in a new accord.While China can target several American allies and territories with intermediate missiles deployed on its own shores, the U.S.’s own options are limited to allies and the tiny territory of Guam. Hua, the foreign ministry spokeswoman, said that any U.S. deployment outside of its own borders will show “its aim will apparently be offensive.”The Global Times, a nationalist newspaper published by China’s Communist Party, said the U.S. risked “geopolitical chaos” with any deployments.“Its impact will be much more serious than that of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense in South Korea, because intermediate-range missiles are undoubted offensive weapons,” the paper said in an editorial published Sunday. “Any country accepting U.S. deployment would be against China and Russia, directly or indirectly, and draw fire against itself.”To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Dandan Li in Beijing at dli395@bloomberg.netTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Brendan Scott at bscott66@bloomberg.net, Jon HerskovitzFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.




from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/2ZLaUx6

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...