Skip to main content

Environmental Advocate Sues Ben & Jerry’s Over Claim Its Products Come From ‘Happy Cows’

(BURLINGTON, Vt.) — Ben & Jerry’s is facing a lawsuit accusing the ice cream maker and its parent company of false advertising by saying the milk and cream in its products comes from “happy cows.”

In a complaint filed Oct. 29 in federal court in Burlington, Vermont, where Ben & Jerry’s was founded, environmental advocate James Ehlers said that many of the farms that produce the milk and cream are factory-style, mass production dairy operations and only some are part of the company’s “Caring Dairy” program.

“In contrast to what Unilever has told consumers, the Products are made from a mixture of (1) milk that comes from farms participating in the “Caring Dairy” program and (2) milk that comes from cows on factory-style, mass-production dairy operations,” the complaint said.

Ben & Jerry’s spokesman Sean Greenwood emailed Friday that the company doesn’t comment on pending lawsuits. He said the company is proud of the work it’s done with Vermont’s family farms and believes its “Caring Dairy” program is the most progressive in the industry.

“We’re committed to building a resilient, regenerative dairy supply,” he wrote.

That includes building soil health through increased cover crops, alternative tilling practices, rotational crops and grazing techniques, according to company’s website about its voluntary “Caring Dairy” program, which also says high quality animal care will produce a higher quality milk.

The complaint by Ehlers, a former gubernatorial candidate, accuses Ben & Jerry’s and Unilever of violating the Vermont consumer protection act, breach of express warranty and unjust enrichment.

It says Unilever has breached the trust of consumers who are at risk of “real and immediate threat of repeated injury, including purchasing deceptively labeled and packaged products sold at prices above their true market value.”

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages.



from TIME https://ift.tt/36NftLp

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...