Skip to main content

Democratic congressman calls briefing on Soleimani strike 'sophomoric and utterly unconvincing'

Democratic congressman calls briefing on Soleimani strike 'sophomoric and utterly unconvincing'Democrats emerged from a briefing on President Trump's decision to authorize a drone strike killing Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani unconvinced it was justified, while Republicans came away more convinced than ever that it was.After a briefing in the House of Representatives on Wednesday about the strike against Soleimani, which Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said last week was to disrupt an "imminent attack" that the administration has not provided details about publicly, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), a member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, told reporters he's still unpersuaded."My reaction to this briefing was it was sophomoric and utterly unconvincing," he said, CNN reports. "I was utterly unpersuaded about any evidence about the imminence of a threat that was new or compelling."Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) agreed, tweeting that he's "still waiting to hear any credible, actionable intelligence indicating that killing Soleimani was necessary to protect Americans."Republicans came away with a very different conclusion, though. Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) said the briefing was "compelling and decisive" and it left "little doubt" that Trump's decision was correct and that there was a "clear and present danger," reports PBS' Yamiche Alcindor. Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) also told Fox News he's now "convinced even more than ever" that Trump made the right call.During the briefing, the administration reportedly provided a "general timeframe of when Soleimani's attacks against US interests in Iraq and in region had been planned," reports CNN's Manu Raju. Trump in an address on Wednesday did not provide further details, only saying that Soleimani was "planning new attacks on American targets, but we stopped him." > "I was -- well, utterly unpersuaded about any evidence about the imminence of a threat that was new or compelling," Rep. Gerry Connolly, a Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said after being briefed on the strike that killed Qasem Soleimani https://t.co/nP8RzQyNut pic.twitter.com/2HxWJGOo7o> > -- CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) January 8, 2020More stories from theweek.com Joe Biden's free ride is over Trump's Iranian diplomacy gambit How Iran could still go to war with Trump — but not America




from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/39P4WAU

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy
Post a Comment
Read more

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG
Post a Comment
Read more

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...
Post a Comment
Read more