Skip to main content

The Atlantic Daily: The Coronavirus Blame Game

Every weekday evening, our editors guide you through the biggest stories of the day, help you discover new ideas, and surprise you with moments of delight. Subscribe to get this delivered to your inbox.

SHUTTERSTOCK / NIH / THE ATLANTIC

With confirmed cases again on the rise—this time like never before—Americans can feel justified in their coronavirus angst. But who should be the target of their ire?

Below, two of our writers warn against faulting the wrong people for the country’s failures.

Blame leadership, not individuals.

Humans struggle to process this kind of risk, Tess Wilkinson-Ryan, a psychology professor, points out. “America’s half-hearted reopening is a psychological morass, a setup for defeat that will be easy to blame on irresponsible individuals while culpable institutions evade scrutiny.”

And stop scolding beachgoers.

“One can hardly imagine a comparatively safer environment than a sunny, windy ocean beach,” Zeynep Tufekci argues. “And yet many news organizations have seized upon beaches, and scenes of beachgoers, as a sign of why things are so bad in the United States.”

PAUL SPELLA / THE ATLANTIC

One question, answered: Say you tested negative for the coronavirus. Could you still have it, but be asymptomatic?

Yes, Sarah Zhang, who recently wrote about the reliability of such tests, says. She explains:

False negatives are possible, especially if you’ve only just caught COVID-19, and the amount of virus in your body is small but growing. I find it helpful to think of it this way: A negative test is not necessarily a “Get out of jail free” card, but it can be one of several factors in your decision-making. If someone has been wearing masks and observing strict social distancing, the negative result probably really is a negative. If they have been to bars recently, then proceed with more caution.

What to read if … you want practical tips:

What to read if … you’re looking for an evening long read:

In addition to the novel coronavirus, Australia is battling a mysterious flesh-eating bacteria “that has proved, in many ways, even more baffling to infectious-disease researchers.”  

BIANCA BAGNARELLI

Dear Therapist

Every Monday, Lori Gottlieb answers questions from readers about their problems, big and small. This week, she advises a reader whose child is trans:

Last summer when my son came home from college, he told my husband and me that he is trans. He said he is a girl, and I am having trouble with this. …

I’m not conservative. I love and accept her, but I’m worried for her.

Read the rest, and Lori’s response. Have a question? Email her at dear.therapist@theatlantic.com. ​​​​​


Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here.



from The Atlantic https://ift.tt/2Z2y7x5

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...