Skip to main content

The Atlantic Daily: The Pandemic Is Changing Where We Live

Every weekday evening, our editors guide you through the biggest stories of the day, help you discover new ideas, and surprise you with moments of delight. Subscribe to get this delivered to your inbox.

CELINA PEREIRA

“For the most part, the pandemic has restricted motion in America,” my colleague Joe Pinsker pointed out earlier this month. “But one exception has been a large-scale nationwide reshuffling of humans between homes.”

Some of this movement has been done out of luxury, some out of necessity. With no end to the economic pain in sight, Americans are caught playing a high-stakes game of musical chairs with the country’s available housing stock. When the music stops, millions could be left with nothing.

Our writers contemplate the consequences of said reshuffling:

Suddenly, life in the suburbs looks awfully appealing.

Urbanists once maligned the American sprawl. “After the anxious spring of 2020, these defects seem like new luxuries,” Ian Bogost argues.

At the start of the pandemic, the rich fled cities. But long-term panic-moves may be risky.

“Fleeing cities is a bigger gamble than many white-collar workers might realize,” Amanda Mull warned last month.

This period may erase some of the stigma around living at home.

Joe Pinsker, a writer on our Family team, makes the case: “The wave of young adults who have recently relocated is a symptom of a grave economic and public-health catastrophe, but living at home is not in and of itself a bad thing.”

A lot of Americans could lose their homes altogether.

Unless the government intervenes. “Fixing it shouldn’t be complicated,” Derek Thompson argues. “Pandemics are complicated, but pandemic economics is simple. Get families cash, or people will go hungry and lose their home.”

GETTY / THE ATLANTIC

One question, answered: How long does COVID-19 immunity last?

A new study spawned frightening headlines suggesting that immunity might disappear within months. But when Derek reached out to scientists to talk him through the research, he found that the truth is a lot more complicated—and less terrifying.

The scientists agreed on three reasons to be skeptical of the more alarmist interpretations of the study’s findings. The first: “Our immune system is a mysterious place,” and this particular study “looked at only one part of it.”

What to read if … you want practical tips:

What to read if … you’re still processing the death of John Lewis:

Read this pair of reflections: Here’s Adam Harris on the world that Lewis helped create, and Adam Serwer on why the congressman was an American founder.  

BIANCA BAGNARELLI

Dear Therapist

Every Monday, Lori Gottlieb answers questions from readers about their problems, big and small. This week, she advises a recent college graduate whose best friend can’t find a job:

She already had a lot of anxiety about getting a good job before the economic crash, but things have just compounded now that jobs are few and far between. … It hurts me to see her so tense about something so far out of her control, but I don’t know what else to do to try to help.

Read the rest, and Lori’s response. Write to her anytime at dear.therapist@theatlantic.com.


Thanks for reading. This email was written by Caroline Mimbs Nyce, with help from Isabel Fattal, and edited by Shan Wang.

Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here.



from The Atlantic https://ift.tt/2BfTiCD

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...