Skip to main content

A Supreme Court Justice Went on A Rant About COVID, Abortion, and LGTBQ Rights

In a move that seemed to toss any semblance of impartiality out the window, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito took aim this week at some of the most charged issues in American life—coronavirus restrictions, LGBTQ rights, and abortion—publicly framing many of them as attacks on religious liberty.

Speaking Thursday at a gathering of the Federal Society, a powerful network of conservative attorneys, Alito tried to walk a fine line between reassuring listeners that he was not “diminishing the severity of the virus’ threat to public health,” while at the same time lashing out at what he sees as ominous restrictions from city and state governments.

“All sorts of things can be called an emergency or disaster of major proportions,” Alito said. “Simply slapping on that label cannot provide the ground for abrogating our most fundamental rights. And whenever fundamental rights are restricted, the Supreme Court and other courts cannot close their eyes.”

Supreme Court justices have traditionally tried to remain above the political fray. In recent years, some have waded into it anyway: Neil Gorsuch and John Roberts have both rebuked President Donald Trump for his attacks on judges and the judicial system. But Alito’s remarks went far beyond anything other justices have said publicly. 

Though he touched on several different topics, Alito returned to one core message: Freedom of speech for religious Americans is now at stake.

“Think of worship services, churches closed on Easter Sunday, synagogues closed for Passover and Yom Kippur,” Alito said in reference to COVID restrictions, adding that lawmaking was being done by executive order, not legislators.

He went on to take a tour of some of the Supreme Court’s most controversial cases, and declare an order of nuns under “unrelenting attack.”  

“You can’t say that marriage is a union between one man and one woman. Until very recently, that’s what the vast majority of Americans thought. Now it’s considered bigotry,” said Alito. In reference to a 2018 case in which a baker declined to make a wedding cake for a gay couple, Alito suggested that the couple was fine because “celebrity chefs have jumped to the couple's defense.”

Perhaps Alito’s favorite talking point, though, was reproductive health care, and he repeatedly expounded on birth control and abortion.

An order of nuns who’ve refused to pay for their employees’ contraception have been, in Alito’s words, “under unrelenting attack for the better part of a decade.” He added that morning-after pills, like Plan B, “destroy an embryo after fertilization”—which is not accurate.  

He also brought up the Supreme Court’s most recent abortion case, involving the Trump administration’s fight to reinstate restrictions on a drug used to induce abortions. Unlike previous cases in which houses of worship challenged COVID-19 restrictions and a majority of justices deferred to the executive branch, Alito was infuriated that this time they refused to side with the administration, instead punting it to a lower court

The case, he said, was evidence that “religious liberty is in danger of becoming a second-class right.”



from VICE US https://ift.tt/36CKSAO

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage...

REPORT: Furious Spike Lee Paces Aisle, Turns Back To Stage... (Top headline, 5th story, link ) Related stories: REVIEW: Hostless Show Starts With Rock & Rolls Off Rails... Actor knocks borders, walls during speech in Spanish... Stage designed to look like Trump hair? 'GREEN BOOK' OVERCOMES BACKLASH, NABS BEST PICTURE... Top Critics Fume... LIST: WINNERS... Advertise here from Drudge Report Feed https://ift.tt/2SUpIKy

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Who Was I to Deprive Him of Joy?’

By Unknown Author from NYT Style https://ift.tt/2UV7YAG

The Ugly History of Dual-Loyalty Charges

When Representative Ilhan Omar recently complained about “the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” many noted accurately that she had deployed a trope—dual loyalty—that had been used against Jews for years. But this accusation has a broader history in the United States, having been used against several religious minorities—including Muslims like Omar. Indeed, many battles over religious freedom have revolved around dual-loyalty claims. [ Read: Ilhan Omar just made it harder to have a nuanced debate about Israel ] In the 19th century, many attacks on Catholics stressed that these immigrants were pawns of a foreign power. In the 1830s, Samuel Morse—then a prominent painter and later the inventor of the telegraph—urged Americans to build “walls” and “gates” to keep out Catholic immigrants, who would always be loyal to Rome. Because these Catholic immigrants were decrepit —“halt, and blind, and naked”—they were easy to co...